---

昨天才在想說SerB大概是偷懶

今天又勤勞了起來...


- SerB states that WoT won't be transferred to a new game engine,
  it would increase the costs and reduce the speed of development

  SerB表示WOT不會轉到新的遊戲引擎上（BigWorld?），這會讓我們的研發
  成本變高並降低開發的速度。

- there has been a project to put a gun more powerful than the
  BL-9 on IS-3: the D-83

  有一個威力更強的火炮D-83已經被計畫放到IS-3上。

- a high power 122mm gun was tested on an IS-2 (more powerful than
  the D-25)

  一個火力更強的122毫米口徑火炮曾在IS-2上（比D-25更棒）

- there were plans to equip the Tigers with engines more powerful
  than the 700hp one, for example an 870hp Maybach, there were
  even more advanced engines, but not for Tiger – by the time
  they were developed, Tiger was already replaced by Tiger II (and
  in future by E-75)




- a non-penetrating HE explosion (on armor) can also set an engine
  on fire (modules get damaged even if the shell doesn't penetrate)

  沒有擊穿裝甲的HE一樣能夠幫引擎「上火」（就算砲彈沒穿，零件還是會
  受到傷害）

- repair kit doesn't fix only the equipment function, but also its
  hitpoints

  維修包不只能修理零件的功能，血量也能回復（譯：應該可以完全回復）

- for now the devs haven’t had time to discuss the perk/skill
  rebalance issues

  開發組現在沒空檢討歷練／技能的重新平衡問題。

- there is no additional bonus for critting enemy gun barrel than
  for damaging other modules

  目前擊傷敵車的砲管不會比擊傷其他零件獲得更多額外的獎勵。

- Q: "How high will be the maximum speed of the new tier 10 French
  heavy without autoloader?" A: "As high as I implement it"

  Q：「無彈莢炮法國新十階重坦可以跑奪快？」
  A：「我們設定奪快就能奪快。」

- Q: "I'd like to see Soviet tanks with autoloaders, why aren't
  there any?"
  A: "Because the Soviets didn't bother with autoloaders"

  Q：「為啥蘇聯一台彈莢車都沒有？我想要啊！」
  A：「因為蘇聯沒將心思放在這貨上。」

- the fact that a skill training is non-linear (first few percent
  require least XP and the last percent requires most XP to train)
  was made with the intent of skill starting to work faster and
  the average skill level related to period of time being higher


  （譯：這段我大概懂他意思，但是很難翻成通順且易懂的語言QAQ）

- SerB states that oscillating turrets and autoloaders are so good
  in the game, because reliability does not play a role in WoT.
  This is intentional, as the developers do not want the player to
  "fight their own tank”, lower real life reliability of
  components is sometimes implemented as lower amount of module
  hitpoints for example



- the fact you disable the encounter and assault modes has no
  influence on map selection

  關掉「遭遇戰」與「突擊戰」模式不會對你的地圖選擇造成影響。

- Soviet autocannon Sh-37 penetration values were taken from tests
  conducted under 60 degrees and not 90 degrees (they are not
  historical), because with the 90 degrees pen the gun would be
  way too overpowered



- based on previous questions, a player asks where else is the
  penetration lower than historical, SerB replies that it's like
  that with many premium shells for example

  之前有個玩家問說還有哪個炮的穿深低於史實，這個問題SerB回覆說：例
  如很多金彈都是這麼設定的。

- SerB states that while the hull drawings for IS-3 on the
  internet are fully adequate, the drawings of the turret armor
  are quite complicated and that's why they haven't been laid out

  SerB說儘管網路上有關IS-3的車體草圖已經足夠齊全了，但砲塔的草圖卻
  十分複雜，這就是為什麼我們沒辦法確定最後設定的原因。

- 122mm U-11 was not proposed for KV-2, it's in the game as a
  stock gun for balance reasons

  U-11（KV-1的122炮）沒有裝在KV-2上的提案，遊戲中完全是為了平衡的
  理由而作為白板炮放在KV-2上。

- SerB states that even though there is a new trend on RU server
  (players intentionally playing bad to have worst stats possible)
  , the thing that will be punished will be these players'
  individual transgressions, not the trend as a whole

  SerB表示最近俄服好像有新風氣（玩家故意打爛讓數據變差），儘管如此
　這樣的事情只會造成個別玩家的違規受到懲罰，風氣本身沒問題。

- at this moment, it is not planned for shells to cause weak armor
  zones (SS: as in, a shell damages armor and the spot will be
  easier to penetrate), apparently this was planed until closed
  testing, it's possible it might appear in the future, but SerB
  states the problem with this would be player perception ("how
  the hell did they penetrate that spot with a weak gun”)


  （譯：對SerB的Troll感到不解中...）

- there will be no "special" tank destroyer vehicle usable only in
  7/42

  不會有只能在7/42模式裏頭使用的特殊TD。（譯：不懂問問題的目的）

- it's possible the Panther II from Patton museum (SS: Panther II
  hull with Panther Ausf.G turret) will make it to the game,
  perhaps as an optional hull

  巴頓博物館裡的黑豹二可能會以「可選車體」的方式會做進遊戲裏頭。
  （SS：黑豹二的車身配上豹式G型砲塔）

- SerB and Storm confirm that T-44-85 will NOT be in 8.9, it's too
  weak and requires more testing, apparently the penetration will
  be buffed

  SerB確認T-44-85不會在8.9更新釋出，這輛車太弱了，需要更多的測試。
  至少他的穿身會被BUFF。

- apparently the function where you can add your own notices to
  your friend list contacts has been considered, but it's
  impossible for some reason to transfer it server-side

  考慮增加「可以添加提示訊息在好友旁」的功能，但是因為某些理由，沒
  辦法隨著伺服器端轉移。（譯：有點不確定）


這篇打完要來面對我的英國近代史作業了，大家隨意看吧（倒地

如果有翻譯上的問題可以留言告知

我明天如果活著回來再來改...

--

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.169.147.210

應該可以這麼說...口語化的表現 orz


所以之後要翻的話，還是翻自動裝填比較好嗎?

※ 編輯: tai33ru         來自: 1.169.147.210        (10/22 21:49)

--