顯示廣告
隱藏 ✕
※ 本文為 MindOcean 轉寄自 ptt.cc 更新時間: 2015-10-14 08:29:46
看板 Gossiping
作者 teeo (teeo)
標題 [問卦] 台GG跟三爽的CPU到底差異在哪?
時間 Tue Oct 13 22:34:08 2015




   我知道14跟16奈米的差別

   三爽的CPU確實是用14奈米做的
   而且也經過了封裝測試
   放在手機裡面運作了
   所以所有接線都沒問題

   那
   是甚麼其他因素,
   造成了CPU
   "功能沒問題,可是效率卻很沒這麼好" 的原因?

   有請各位又高又瘦又帥,又是30公分起跳的溫拿解答

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.37.138.171
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1M7HPZTt (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1444746851.A.777.html
Sibelius26: 這篇沒I don't care 我自食三加侖臭酸宅洨1F 10/13 22:34
conbanwa: 插在愛縫裡2F 10/13 22:34
q2203649: 忘了在製程裡面加入新鮮的肝3F 10/13 22:35
autoppp: know-how4F 10/13 22:35
dostey 
dostey: APR5F 10/13 22:35
happy27727: I do care6F 10/13 22:35
nuggets: I won't care7F 10/13 22:35
gbcowandy: I do car8F 10/13 22:35
gdgy: I don't car.9F 10/13 22:36
edwardaz01: 他們沒有輪班星人10F 10/13 22:36
gbcg9725: i do car11F 10/13 22:36
ioioeoeo: 文組看不懂啦 反正台g比較好12F 10/13 22:36
delaluna: 這不是有沒有問題的pass/fail測試 而是作的品質好不好13F 10/13 22:36
visualsense: I don't caca14F 10/13 22:36
tsukasa107: I don't carry.15F 10/13 22:37
axzs1111 
axzs1111: i don't core16F 10/13 22:37
BlueGlad: I don't carrefour17F 10/13 22:37
Mellissa: 早年CPU也是 P4剛出來也是被AMD k7舊製成效能打18F 10/13 22:37
Vincent8026: 1 dorit oare19F 10/13 22:37
liopei: you don't care20F 10/13 22:37
delaluna: P4的問題在架構不在製程21F 10/13 22:37
maesww: GG製程 良率 低耗電 穩定性全面KO對手22F 10/13 22:37
double21: 漏電啊  google一下23F 10/13 22:38
angeltear15: 文組??24F 10/13 22:38
ynd: 一個三小時沒點一個五小時25F 10/13 22:38
applekidd: I don't capcom26F 10/13 22:38
jason700t: I don't are27F 10/13 22:38
hank12332: I cant care28F 10/13 22:39
a3831038: GOOGLE不會?29F 10/13 22:39
roy53 
roy53: 1 don't care30F 10/13 22:39
cpz: I  DOES'T CARE31F 10/13 22:39
JuiFu617: I always care32F 10/13 22:39
pudge: I don't cafe33F 10/13 22:39
azzc1031: I don't ㄈare34F 10/13 22:39
zzxcasd 
zzxcasd: I don't obov35F 10/13 22:40
pudge: 坐等吃__.avi36F 10/13 22:40
followwar: I dot car37F 10/13 22:41
wicer5566: 因為沒新鮮的肝38F 10/13 22:41
nocallmom: I don't translation39F 10/13 22:41
JuiFu617: 艾動凱爾40F 10/13 22:41
notbed: I on car41F 10/13 22:41
amigowei: i dont cake42F 10/13 22:41
YamagiN: 給你最高級的球鞋 你一樣打不贏沒穿鞋的Jordan43F 10/13 22:41
showsss: 下面有請 A 10ㄍ044F 10/13 22:41
Butcherdon: 1 d0n't c@re45F 10/13 22:41
imdogpig: 我的要台積電,我要台積電,就這麼簡單,給我換,我要換46F 10/13 22:43
t20000911: I don't cave47F 10/13 22:43
waloloo: 信仰48F 10/13 22:43
dannpptt: I 東 care49F 10/13 22:44
akila324: 一樓可以開始打了50F 10/13 22:44
DOOHDLIHC: I D○N'T CARE51F 10/13 22:44
kibou: I dcn't care52F 10/13 22:45
kershaw1221: I bon't care53F 10/13 22:46
ste926: I qon't care54F 10/13 22:46
jason1992999: I don't carry.55F 10/13 22:46
aster111598: 你以為只有差在製程這麼簡單嗎?56F 10/13 22:47
jeross: 一堆假果粉,都是安卓轉職的吧。真果粉才不care硬體。57F 10/13 22:50
JDKnife: 國外做測試差異才3%左右 霉體硬要拿失準的測試誇大58F 10/13 22:50
airua: l d0n'匕 care59F 10/13 22:51
Hateson: 晶片每一道製程都可能有關 黃光:曝光能量 擴散:參雜濃度60F 10/13 22:51
Hateson: 接面深度 薄膜:沉積速率 蝕刻:蝕刻均勻度
bearinwhite: I don't cowcow62F 10/13 22:54
insingW: 良率差、會漏電、散熱不佳。63F 10/13 22:55
ms06293156: I don't car巳64F 10/13 22:59
pzr721118: 1樓手動搖桿開啟中65F 10/13 22:59
Iam87: i d覊't care66F 10/13 23:00
nysky: 美國有人測試差異到80%,阿婆平均3%的差異這種謊話還敢講67F 10/13 23:00
andypig04: I don't cry.68F 10/13 23:01
farly70922: I do cake69F 10/13 23:01
tzback: I don't scare70F 10/13 23:06
angus10498: I don't cry.71F 10/13 23:07
hoij79627: I don't cook72F 10/13 23:10
yuyu5566: I don't cry73F 10/13 23:10
goodman1015: I'm care74F 10/13 23:10
s062734: I don't cat75F 10/13 23:14
catname: ii ddo care76F 10/13 23:14
a84024b: I don't fuck77F 10/13 23:15
hayato01: 把測試條件降低來遮羞而已,直接測下去差不少78F 10/13 23:16
ken52037g: I donate car.79F 10/13 23:17
x222333123: 三顆星當然比較耗電80F 10/13 23:17
hayato01: 人家汽車測試撞擊用65公里的時速測,你用45下去撞說兩個81F 10/13 23:18
hayato01: 差不多...然後要人家別開到60公里以上,自欺欺人而已
zxp910510: Intel duo core83F 10/13 23:19
DuFanSong: 不是三星的3D效能比較好嗎 所以會很耗電????84F 10/13 23:20
OOQ: 差在肝的新鮮程度85F 10/13 23:20
james4210: i dcn't care86F 10/13 23:22
gn01881106: I dor't care. 已救不謝87F 10/13 23:25
shizusumi: I do not carry88F 10/13 23:27
kevin6677: 20%89F 10/13 23:28
sexbox: I don't career90F 10/13 23:28
ex876: I d¤n't care91F 10/13 23:29
scheiss: Das ist mir egal.不用謝92F 10/13 23:31
ac97631: 奇怪了整一樓那麼好玩嗎我現在就來救順便整治這風氣I don93F 10/13 23:31
ac97631: 't care.
leinru:  I I I不完~95F 10/13 23:33
chunger13: 電致遷移96F 10/13 23:38
ruby60625: I bon't care97F 10/13 23:40
ruby60625: care don't I
twtwtw: I don't call99F 10/13 23:44
chinafree: 三爽→再排隊→三爽→再排隊 loop100F 10/13 23:45
chinafree: 台gg then end
ntpupu: 好啦 救你 不用謝我102F 10/13 23:45
Lineage097: 愛统cat103F 10/13 23:52
lunlee1214: 推文越看越好笑XD104F 10/13 23:55
poloshirt: 差在modeling啦 傻傻的 obov你說對嗎?105F 10/13 23:57
peter821201: I don"t care106F 10/13 23:57
joe989879: 有人推了啦 QQ roy53...107F 10/13 23:58
poorguy: roy53是推'1' don't care 相當幽默108F 10/14 00:02
GGinler: I don't share109F 10/14 00:06
Luver: l d0n't ㄈare110F 10/14 00:14
powerworld21: I don't cane111F 10/14 00:15
ffnokiact: 三加侖要尻多久,有ㄈㄓ要捐一點給1樓嗎?112F 10/14 00:17
heruru: I don't save.113F 10/14 00:21
Lars5: I don't cave.114F 10/14 00:30
Lars5: 認真推         I do'nt care
e2167471: I didn't care116F 10/14 00:47
perryspy: !  d0n`ㄒ  ㄈ@r巳117F 10/14 00:49
perryspy: 救一樓
chozenker: 有個常上電視的3c達人說沒差119F 10/14 00:58
HIDEI524: I am sad120F 10/14 01:12
aet68933: I done care121F 10/14 01:18
applebeloved: 1樓吃吧122F 10/14 01:31
lovelebron24: I don't care123F 10/14 01:37
Sibelius26: 感謝樓上救援 洨已經請臭酸宅打好準備喝了 可惜啊...124F 10/14 01:55
Sibelius26: I don't care....
pudovkinTW: 24好像是 推小寫L126F 10/14 02:06
pudovkinTW:  lI L比較長
jizz0010513: | dan't care.  不用謝了128F 10/14 02:24
a426087: 矮冬瓜129F 10/14 02:39
heruru: 比對過了,24的確救了一樓130F 10/14 03:24
onsera: 一樓被救了啊131F 10/14 05:27
sicao: I don't care132F 10/14 06:33
ak77now 
ak77now: 救啥小 幹133F 10/14 07:14
isawaghost: 又個自救會134F 10/14 07:24

--
※ 看板: Gossiping 文章推薦值: 0 目前人氣: 0 累積人氣: 2619 
作者 teeo 的最新發文:
點此顯示更多發文記錄
分享網址: 複製 已複製
1樓 時間: 2015-10-14 10:21:29 (台灣)
  10-14 10:21 TW
插在樓主的大腦
2樓 時間: 2015-10-14 11:53:37 (台灣)
  10-14 11:53 TW
有人測效能的確差不多,但是發熱跟耗電量很明顯有差
3樓 時間: 2015-10-14 12:59:09 (台灣)
  10-14 12:59 TW
有奶和貧乳
4樓 時間: 2015-10-14 14:40:49 (台灣)
  10-14 14:40 TW
ㄏㄏ韓狗愛cost down死好
10-14 23:29 TW
newuser56:[自己刪除]
6樓 時間: 2015-10-16 01:17:18 (台灣)
  10-16 01:17 TW
如果三星CPU好 為什麼美國內銷幾乎都是台積電的 = = 那些戰CPU沒差的人可以解釋嗎~~~~
r)回覆 e)編輯 d)刪除 M)收藏 ^x)轉錄 同主題: =)首篇 [)上篇 ])下篇